Village de la Justice www.village-justice.com

Extradition procedure in France. Par Avi Bitton and Lois Pamela Lesot, Avocats.
Parution : mardi 11 août 2020
Adresse de l'article original :
https://www.village-justice.com/articles/extradition-procedure-france,36160.html
Reproduction interdite sans autorisation de l'auteur.

This article is an introduction to extraditions laws and procedures in France.

Résumé en français de l’article sur l’extradition en anglais.

L’extradition est la procédure par laquelle un Etat, l’Etat requis, accepte de livrer une personne qui se trouve sur son territoire à un autre Etat, l’Etat requérant, qui la recherche afin de la juger pour la commission d’un crime ou d’un délit ou afin de mettre à exécution une peine déjà prononcée pour la commission d’un crime ou d’un délit.

En droit français, la procédure et les conditions de l’extradition sont organisées par les articles 696 et suivants du Code de procédure pénale. Néanmoins, lorsqu’une Convention internationale a été signée entre la France et un Etat tiers, celle-ci s’applique en priorité.

Ces Conventions sont de plus en plus nombreuses. Leur intérêt est de limiter le pouvoir discrétionnaire des Etats de consentir ou non à une demande d’extradition : l’exécution de l’extradition devient une obligation dès lors que les conditions posées par les stipulations de la Convention applicable sont réunies.

Par ailleurs, au sein de l’Union Européenne, les Etats ont mis en place une procédure accélérée d’extradition : le mandat d’arrêt européen (articles 695-11 et suivants du Code de procédure pénale).
La procédure et les conditions détaillées ci-dessous, en anglais, constituent le droit commun français, et doivent donc être respectées lorsque les Conventions internationales ou le mandat d’arrêt européen ne sont pas applicables.


Extradition is the procedure by which a State, the requested State, accepts to surrender a person who is on its territory to another State, the requesting State, which seeks him in order to bring him to Court for the commission of an offence or in order to carry out a sentence already pronounced for the commission of an offence.

Under French law, the procedure and the conditions for an extradition are organized by articles 696 et seq. of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, when an international convention has been signed between France and another State, this convention applies first. These international conventions are more and more numerous. Their interest is to limit the discretionary power of the States to consent or not to an extradition request : the execution of the extradition becomes an obligation when the conditions set by the convention are met.

In addition, in the European Union, Member States have implemented a simplified procedure : the European arrest [1].

The procedure and conditions detailed below constitute French common law, and must therefore be followed when international conventions or the European arrest warrant are not applicable.

I. Matters which may give rise to the issuing of an extradition request.

Extradition may concern any person suspected or convicted of being the author, co-perpetrator or accomplice of an offence or its attempt.

The matters which may give rise to the issuing of an extradition request are offences where the maximum prison sentence incurred is two years or more, or, in the case of a convicted person, where the sentence imposed by the Court is of two months’ imprisonment or more [2].

These matters must also be punished, by French law, with a similar sentence : it is the requirement of double criminalisation. Extradition can only be granted by the French government if French law also punishes the offence on which the request for extradition is based by an imprisonment sentence.

Furthermore, extradition can only be granted if the offence for which the request has been made was committed :

On the territory of the requesting State ;
Outside of the territory of the requesting State by a national from that State ;
Outside of the territory of the requesting State by a foreigner, where the offence features among those for which French law authorises prosecution in France, even if they are committed by a foreigner abroad [3].

II. The surrender procedure when France is the requested State.

A. The request for provisional arrest by the requesting State.

The submission and execution of an extradition request can be lengthy, in particular due to :

The time required to gather the documents needed for the request ;
The use of diplomatic channels, which inevitably takes time.

However, the wanted person must not be able to take advantage of these delays to flee.

Consequently, French law provides that in urgent cases, at the direct request of the requesting State, the Prosecutor general with territorial jurisdiction can order the provisional arrest of the person sought for the purpose of extradition [4].

The provisionally arrested person is released if, within thirty days of his arrest, the French government has not received the documents required for the extradition. If, later, the documents reach the French government, the procedure can resume.

B. Formulation of the extradition request through diplomatic channels.

All extradition requests must be addressed to the French government through diplomatic channels, and accompanied by the necessary documents, namely :

A decision recording a conviction ; or
An act of criminal procedure formally ordering the referral of the accused person before the criminal Court, or
An arrest warrant or an act of the same force [5].

The extradition request is, after verification of the documents, transmitted with the case file by the Minister of Foreign Affairs to the Minister of Justice, who, after ensuring the legality of the request, sends it to the Prosecutor general with territorial jurisdiction [6].

C. The person’s appearance before the Prosecutor general.

Following his arrest, the requested person must be brought within 48 hours before the Prosecutor general with territorial jurisdiction. During this period, he has the same rights as a person in police custody [7].

The Prosecutor general verifies the identity of the person and informs him of :
- The existence and content of the extradition request ;
- His possibility of being assisted by a lawyer ;
- His faculty to consent to his extradition and the legal consequences resulting from this consent ;
- His possibility to waive the “specialty rule” according to which the person surrendered to the requesting State after the execution of an extradition request cannot be prosecuted, sentenced or detained for a matter that happened prior to the surrender and other than that which motivated the extradition.

The person sought is incarcerated, unless his representation in all procedural steps is sufficiently guaranteed. He can request his release at any time, in front of the Investigation Chamber, and can be placed under judicial supervision or house arrest instead [8].

D. The person’s appearance before the Investigation Chamber.

The requested person must then appear before the Investigation Chamber, within :
- Five working days from the date of his presentation to the Prosecutor general when he declared to the latter that he consents to his extradition [9] ;
- Ten working days when he declared that he does not consent to his extradition [10].

The hearing is usually public.

After being informed of the legal consequences of his choice, the person must again declare whether he consents to his extradition or not. This consent is not required for the execution of the extradition, but once again, it helps to expedite the process.

If the person consents to his extradition and the legal conditions for such extradition are met, the Investigation Chamber must allow it within seven days of the appearance of the person, unless additional information has been ordered. This decision is not subject to appeal [11].

On the other hand, if the requested person does not consent to his extradition, the Investigation Chamber must rule within one month of the appearance of the person before it, unless additional information has been ordered. The decision is necessarily unfavourable if the Court considers that the legal conditions for an extradition are not met or that there is an obvious error. The decision can be appealed, on the basis of an error of form only [12].

E. The government’s execution of an extradition request.

If the decision of the Investigation Chamber is unfavourable to the extradition and it is final, extradition cannot be granted. The person sought, if not detained for another cause, must be released [13].

In the other cases, the favourable opinion of the Investigation Chamber does not bind the government, which is still free not to grant the extradition : the execution of the extradition remains a faculty for the government, not an obligation.

If the government decides to grant the extradition, the extradition is authorised by a Prime Minister’s decree, taken on the basis of a report from the Minister of Justice. No time limit is set by law for the Prime Minister to issue this decree following the favourable opinion of the Investigation Chamber.

The requested person must be delivered to the agents of the requesting State within one month of the notification of the Prime Minister’s decree to said State. Otherwise, the person is, except in cases of force majeure, automatically released and can no longer be claimed for the same cause.

Appeals against the Prime Minister’s decree can be filed within one month [14].

F. Competing extradition requests.

If extradition is requested concurrently by several States for a single offence, it is preferably granted to the State against whose interests the offence was directed, or to the State on whose territory it was committed [15].

However, if the competing requests are based on different offences, the request that must take priority is chosen with regards to all factual circumstances and, in particular, the gravity and the place of the offence, the date of the requests, and the undertaking which one of the requesting States has made to carry out a re-extradition.

Furthermore, if the person requested from the French government is already being prosecuted or has already been sentenced in France for a different offence, surrender is only made after the end of the proceedings and, in the event of conviction, after the execution of the sentence. However, the requested person may be sent temporarily to appear before the Courts of the requesting State, on the condition that he will be returned to France as soon as the foreign Courts have ruled [16].

III. The means to oppose the surrender of a requested person.

Extradition is not granted where :
- The requested person is of French nationality, as determined at the date of the offence for which the extradition is requested ;
- The offence has a political character, or the circumstances reveal that the extradition is requested for political reasons ;
- The offence was committed on French national territory ;
- The offence, while committed outside French national territory, was prosecuted and tried in France ;
- The limitation period for the prosecution or for the penalty has expired prior to the request for extradition, and in general the right to prosecute in the requesting State is extinguished ;
- The requesting State imposes a penalty or a safety measure contrary to French public policy (for example, if the requesting State has the death penalty, extradition can only be granted if the requesting States guarantees that death penalty will not be enforced) ;
- The requested person would be tried in the requesting State by a Court which does not provide fundamental procedural guarantees and protection for the rights of the defence ;
- The offence constitutes a military offence [17].

IV. The surrender procedure when France is the requesting State.

The Code of Criminal Procedure does not regulate the extradition requested by France. Indeed, the procedure will be carried out, mainly, abroad, therefore France has no jurisdiction to regulate it. However, the procedure is preceded by a French phase of preparation and presentation of the request, and followed by another French phase after the reception of the extradited person.

A. Formulation of the extradition request.

The Prosecutor of the Republique of Court with jurisdiction must collect the documents necessary for the presentation of the extradition request. These documents are identified by the requested State’s law. The file thus constituted is transmitted to the Prosecutor General and then to the Ministry of Justice.

The Minister of Justice communicates the request to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is then the responsibility of the Minister of Foreign Affairs to transmit the request to the French Embassy in the requested State, in order for it to be communicated to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the requested State by the French agent accredited to that State.

B. The invalidity of extradition in the event of non-compliance with the law.

The extradition obtained by the French government is void if it did not comply with the conditions provided for by the French Code of Criminal Procedure [18]. In particular, extradition must be carried out in accordance with the conditions relating to the nature of the offence or its punishment, and with the rules which prohibit extradition, for example, when the offence is of a political nature.

Immediately after the imprisonment of the extradited person, the Prosecutor general advises him that he has the right :

To request that the extradition be declared void ;
To be assisted by a lawyer.

The request presented by the extradited person must be justified and addressed, within ten days of the discussion with the Prosecutor general :

To the registry of the trial Court or of the Investigation Chamber ;
To the head of the prison when the person is detained.

If the extradition is declared void, the extradited person, if not sought by the requested State, is released [19].

V. The effects of extradition.

Extradition is in principle granted only on the condition that the extradited person will neither be prosecuted nor sentenced for an offence other than the one(s) which motivated the extradition and committed prior to the surrender [20].

However, this rule of specialty does not apply when the person waives it or when the requested State gives its consent [21].

Avi Bitton and Lois Pamela Lesot, Lawyers to the Paris Bar Tel.: ++33 (0)1.46.47.68.42 Email: [->avocat@avibitton.com] Site: [->https://www.avibitton.com]

[1Articles 695-11 et seq. of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

[2Article 696-3 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[3Article 696-2 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[4Articles 696-23 and 696-24 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[5Article 696-8 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[6Article 696-9 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[7Article 696-10 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[8Articles 696-11 et 696-19 à 696-21 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[9Article 696-13 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[10Article 696-15 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[11Article 696-14 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[12Article 696-15 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[13Article 696-17 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[14Article 696-18 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[15Article 696-5 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[16Article 696-7 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[17Article 696-4 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[18Article 696-36 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[19Articles 696-38 and 696-39 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[20Article 696-6 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.

[21Articles 696-34 and 696-35 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure.